5.26.2005

Not sure what to make of this

As many of you know, services like Site Meter allow you to see how people are arriving at your blog--i.e., what links they're following. This includes searches. Recently, someone found my home blog via this search:

Foer naked

They didn't get what they were looking for, of course; I do not have naked pictures of Jonathan Safran Foer. I did, however, make a reference to naked pictures of Saddam Hussein, and that post, plus one about Foer, caused my site to pop up.

I don't know what to say. My criticism of Foer is based solely on his work; I have no opinion on his overall physical attractiveness, except to say that he looks like a smarmy little bastard.

5.19.2005

In his own words

A wise man once said:
There are, indeed, things that cannot be put into words. They make themselves manifest.
Likewise, the shittiness of Jonathan Safran Foer is not something that can properly be explained or described. You have to experience it for yourself.

While you get a pretty good idea of how shitty he is just by looking at pictures of his smarmy little face (which, by the way, are all over the place; beware of any writer who is photographed this much), it doesn't really give you a full understanding of how criminal it is that Foer is actually being heralded as one of the most talented young writers out there, not to mention 'earning' seven-figure advances. No: for that, you must plunge into the belly of the beast, and actually read some of the vile tripe that he has published.

Of course, you don't want to actually go out and buy his ridiculous books--that's exactly what he wants you to do! Instead, I am going to post a few choice excerpts from the first chapter of his latest novel, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close.

Now, the book is narrated by a ten-year-old Noah McCullough-wannabe named Oskar whose father died in the WTC attack, so the faux-precociousness is supposed to be cute, I guess. But this is dangerous territory for any writer, and Foer simply isn't talented enough to pull it off.

The book begins with Oskar rambling about nothing in particular:

what the?

What about a teakettle? What if the spout opened and closed when the steam came out, so it would become a mouth, and it could whistle pretty melodies, or do Shakespeare, or just crack up with me? I could invent a teakettle that reads in Dad’s voice, so I could fall asleep, or maybe a set of kettles that sings the chorus of “Yellow Submarine,” which is a song by the Beatles, who I love, because entomology is one of my raisons d’être, which is a French expression that I know ...

Mmmkay ...

Isn’t it so weird how the number of dead people is increasing even though the earth stays the same size, so that one day there isn’t going to be room to bury anyone anymore? For my ninth birthday last year, Grandma gave me a subscription to National Geographic, which she calls “the National Geographic.” She also gave me a white blazer, because I only wear white clothes, and it’s too big to wear so it will last me a long time ... Anyway, the fascinating thing was that I read in National Geographic that there are more people alive now than have died in all of human history. In other words, if everyone wanted to play Hamlet at once, they couldn’t, because there aren’t enough skulls!

Ain't little Oskar just so adorably quirky! Why, he only wears white clothes for no particular fucking reason (although I'm sure there's some important reason we'll find out about later!), and he knows Shakespeare!

Oskar then recounts the day of his father's funeral:

Even though I’m not anymore, I used to be an atheist, which means I didn’t believe in things that couldn’t be observed. I believed that once you’re dead, you’re dead forever, and you don’t feel anything, and you don’t even dream. It’s not that I believe in things that can’t be observed now, because I don’t. It’s that I believe that things are extremely complicated. And anyway, it’s not like we were actually burying him, anyway.

... I looked up at the limousine’s sunroof, and I imagined the world before there were ceilings, which made me wonder: Does a cave have no ceiling, or is a cave all ceiling?

... “Mom?” “Yes?” “I have a question.” “OK.” “What are you squeezing in your purse? She pulled out her hand and opened it, and it was empty. “Just squeezing,” she said. Even though it was an incredibly sad day, she looked so, so beautiful. I kept trying t figure out a way to tell her that, but all of the ways I thought of were weird and wrong. She was wearing the bracelet that I made for her, and that made me feel like one hundred dollars. I love making jewelry for her, because it makes her happy, and making her happy is another one of my raisons d’être.

When Dad was tucking me in ... the night before the worst day, I asked if the world was a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise. “Excuse me?” “It’s just that why does the earth stay in place instead of falling through the universe?” “Is this Oskar I’m tucking in? Has an alien stolen his brain for experimentation?” I said “We don’t believe in aliens.” He said, “The earth does fall through the universe. You know that, buddy. It’s constantly falling toward the sun. That’s what it means to orbit.” So I said, “Obviously, but why is there gravity?” He said, “What do you mean why is there gravity?” “What’s the reason?” “Who said there had to be a reason?” “No one did, exactly.” “My question was rhetorical.” “What’s that mean?” “It mean I wasn’t asking it for an answer, but to make a point.” “What point?”

“That there doesn’t have to be a reason.” “But if there isn’t a reason, then why does the universe exist at all?” “Because of sympathetic conditions.” “So then why am I your son?” “Because Mom and I made love, and one of my sperm fertilized one of her eggs.” “Excuse me while I regurgitate.” “Don’t act your age.” “Well, what I don’t get is why do we exist? I don’t mean how, but why.” I watched the fireflies of his thoughts orbit his head. He said, “We exist because we exist.” “What the?” “We could imagine all sorts of universes unlike this one, but this is the one that happened.”

... After a while, Dad asked me if I was awake. I told him no, because I knew that he didn’t like to leave until I had fallen asleep, and I didn’t want him to be tired for work in the morning. He kissed my forehead and said good night, and then he was a the door.

“Dad?” “Yeah, buddy?” “Nothing.”

Is that the lamest bit of dialogue you have ever read, or what! How many exchanges like this have you seen in movies or books? One person is about to leave; the other calls their name. 'Yes?' they say.

'Nothing.'

And how many times have you ever seen such an exchange in real life?

But then again, despite the setting, Foer isn't writing about real life. But he's not writing fantasies, either. Like so many 'artists' these days, Foer is content to transcribe his own artificial, second-hand experience of the world. He sees himself as so gosh-darned special that he doesn't have to bother actually knowing anything outside of himself; all he's interested in doing is finding a vehicle to let you know what an intelligent and unique and insightful person he is--without bothering to have any actual insights, because, you know, that's hard work; that requires a focus on something other than your own cleverness.

Barf. Anyone who can stomach it can read the entire first chapter here (PDF).

You've been warned.
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

5.17.2005

The One Thing Everyone Can Agree On

Gawker and the NY Press hate each other, but just like Sunnis and Shiites they can see past their differences to a common enemy. The Gawker post:
As Solomon writes of one rendezvous:
“I think it would be nice to meet again,” he wrote one day. “It will give me a chance to give you a fuller picture—even if the fuller picture is not a better picture… . It pains me to think that I have not yet given you enough about me, as a person. Two meetings. What if, by chance—by mood, by weather, by biochemistry—I grossly misrepresented myself?”

Fair enough. Plans were made to meet outside the main branch of the New York Public Library one Wednesday at noon. That morning, more e-mail messages arrived, the last of which was sent knowingly to an empty desk: “Writing this from the Kinko’s across the street from the Public Library,” Foer noted. “It’s 11:41 and I’ve done it again: arrived for a rendezvous more than 15 minutes early. Anyway, I’m assuming you won’t read this until after we meet, which leaves these words hanging in some nowhere time… . See you soon, hours ago.”
The old letter waiting for you after the encounter trick: emo boys the world over know it well.

And speaking of Michelle Malkin’s favorite musical genre, Solomon’s piece made us want to cut ourselves. A lot. But maybe, as Foer’s agent Nicole Aragi anticipates, we’re just player hating: “Jonathan has had to live with so much jealousy, it’s had me ripping my hair out.”

Congrats, JSF! I think you might be the only person in the whole world that both groups agree to hate! What an honor!
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

Steve Gilliard Speaks the Truth

Steve Gilliard published an excellent post titled Outlaw Journalism and the Blogs soon after the death of Hunter S. Thompson. Among other things, he talks about the cancer that has spread throughout modern fiction. A selection:
The other is the irrevelant nature of modern fiction writing. The worst thing to ever happen to writing was the writing program. Because it allowed people to focus on the trivia in their lives. The greatness of Heller and Mailer escapes these mindless twits nattering about their cheating dads and pill popping moms. It's not even a world of clever craftsmen like Thomas Pynchon, but of navel gazers like Dave Eggers. Eggers, a silly, irrelevant man in a serious time, draws only my contempt and scorn. I mean, his idea of struggle was living off inherentences. Not that his personal story wasn't tragic, but it's not Sophie's Choice. The problem is that Eggers and his little group of confederates are trivial people in a not trivial time.

So you have journalists, Washington journalists, who report but do not question, getting squeamish when people do, like Helen Thomas, seeking to live off the handouts of their "sources", and get the hand-fed "scoop" which will sell papers. And fiction writers more concerned with apartments and cheating mates than the world around them.

Here are some random quotes from current fiction on Amazon. I won't name the authors to spare them embarassment:
Shane McCarthy is a Berkeley-educated chimney sweep, plying his trade in the mercurial atmosphere of dot-com bubble San Francisco circa 1999. His wife, Lou, glides in and out, obsessed with making her own start-up fortune. Outside of home and work, Shane's life revolves around basketball games at the Firehouse, an asphalt refuge where he plays the game with other 30-somethings, reveling in the physicality of crashing bodies.
.........
You can't escape him. He swerves in and out of your life as if effortlessly walking through a crowded restaurant. He's a passive-aggressive master. He's as undetectable as a whisper and as effective as a tiny toxic pill. You probably went to school with him, and he knows everything you've done-every foolish secret ambition you've nurtured, everyone you wish you'd never slept with, every lame, fleeting trend you've embraced. The Underminer throws you into a spiral of self-doubt each time you see him.
...........
Prep is the story of Lee Fiora, a South Bend, Indiana, teenager who wins a scholarship to the prestigious Ault school, an East Coast institution where "money was everywhere on campus, but it was usually invisible." As we follow Lee through boarding school, we witness firsthand the triumphs and tragedies that shape our heroine's coming-of-age. Yet while Sittenfeld may be a skilled storyteller, her real gift lies in her ability to expertly give voice to what is often described as the most alienating period in a young person's life: high school.
............
The Right Address seeks to expose the cruel and wicked ways of the top echelon of the Park Avenue crowd. Peppered with seemingly unbelievable accounts of social-climbing at its worst, the characters in this novel glide from party to party, relishing every possible chance to destroy each other's reputation while simultaneously air-kissing one another.
Notice the trivial nature of these books. Their self-absorption and lack of interest in the wider world. It is masturbation in print for the most part, and irrelevant. You would hardly know that men are hunting men in the mountains of Afghanistan and dodging roadside bombs in Iraq. The world of the vital has escaped our fiction, to be replaced by the world of the trivial and self-involved. Why? Because that is what drives the writing program, those who write well about themselves, but without the real introspection needed to be honest. The Naked and the Dead is a savage tale of men at war, Catch 22 lacking in any kind of larger heroism. These were not tales which made the authors heroic, but exposed their foibles and their fears. What is usually missing from the description of these modern novels is the condescension the authors feel for their subjects. These books are about revenge on imperfect lives, the failures of their parents and those around them. There is no honesty in them, because the honesty is bred out of them.

Their template is the Catcher in the Rye, but lacks the brutal self-analysis JD Salinger brought to it. But then, like his peers, his anger was driven by the war he had fought. These program-raised authors are angry because their lives were imperfect. They have never missed a meal, felt fear at seeing the police, much less rode in a truck past a bomb. They are angry at the safety and comfort of their lives.

So when you need a brutal, honest fiction to deal with lives in Bush's America, and it's contradictions, you get bitter drivel.
What did I tell you? Steve Gilliard Speaks the truth. You could just as easily say Eggers instead of Foer.
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

Extremely Cloying and Incredibly False

The title of Harry Siegel's brilliant take down of JSF in The New York Press. A selection:

Why do people wonder what's "OK" to make art about, as if creating art out of tragedy weren't an inherently good thing? Too many people are too suspicious of art. Too many people hate art. –Jonathan Safran Foer, on why he wrote a 9/11 book.

Call me a hater, then.

It's bad form to call a living writer corrupt and debased, which is why I begged out of a review I'd been assigned of Jonathan Safran Foer's highly touted debut novel, Everything Is Illuminated. The book struck me as an admixture of shtick and sentiment, the most self-involved work about the Holocaust since Maus, with all the gravitas of Robin Williams' Jakob the Liar. I understand how a young man could write such a book, but not why he would have it published, and certainly not how it could be acclaimed as marking the arrival of a major new talent. (The $500,000 advance, and later nearly $1 million for the movie rights, and another $1 million for the follow-up, may have helped.)

There's a story I heard that a former student, a man in his 20s, bumped into Barbara Rose, the cruel and wise art critic and teacher, and began telling her how well things were going for him—that he had an agent now, successful shows under his belt, patrons, the whole nine yards. Rose shook her head and asked him, "How can someone so young be so unambitious?" and went on her way.

Having "read" Foer's latest—if that's what one does to this cut-and-paste assemblage of words, pictures, blank pages and pages where the text runs together and becomes illegible—it's time for bad form.

Foer isn't just a bad author, he's a vile one.

Siegel carries on in similar fashion for for a good while. A must read.
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

NY Press Attacks

Unfortunately, Foer didn't make this year's list of 50 Most Loathsome, but he was given the honor of this paragraph as a teaser for the list.
Two years ago we dismissed the Princeton-educated, Park Slope-slumming Foer as a one-hit wonder and a fraud. Oops. If the blinking lights on our early warning system are any indication, Foer's follow-up will be met with the same breathless blowjobs from the same daft critics. Take Deborah Solomon's giddy profile in the New York Times Magazine, where Foer proves himself the same smarmy, arrogant and falsely insecure punk he was the last time around. No doubt this next round of fame will cause the "poet-wanderer" to give quotes even more loathsome than, "I write because I want to end my loneliness" and "It pains me to think that I have not yet given you enough about me, as a person." Quite the contrary, Jonathan, we've had our fill.
Fuck you, Jonathan Safran Foer!
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

Foer Makes the 2003 NY Press Readers' Poll

From the way back machine. The full text and JSF's listing:
5 Jonathan Safran Foer, One-Hit Wonder:
Joyce Carol Oates invented this Jewish mother’s wet dream in a Princeton laboratory, and now we have to live in a world where eager-to-please frauds like Foer receive unearned comparisons to geniuses like Burgess and Joyce. Continuing a disturbing recent literary trend, his overhyped, cutesy first novel, Everything Is Illuminated, features a fictional protagonist whose name is Jonathan Safran Foer. Incidentally, most of us get along just fine with a mere two names, dick.

NY Press, you're my hero! Too bad you were wrong about the one hit wonder.
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

Low Culture Goes for the Jugular

It was this Low Culture post that alerted me to the existence of JSF. The wonderfully titled, Everything is Shit. Re-printed in full.

With a new Amazon entry for the Jonathan Safran Foer novel Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (via Maud), the literary set is treated to a sneak-peek at the wonderblah’s sophomore effort. And boy-o, does it look hot…

From our Amazonian product description:

Oskar Schell is an inventor, Francophile, tambourine player, Shakespearean actor, jeweler, pacifist. He is nine years old.

Already we’ve got a Wes Anderson adaptation waiting to happen (Rushmost?). Maybe Jonathan Lipnicki is a little old – but wouldn’t he be perfect? Precocious, non-threatening and Tiger Beat enough to pull off this acrobatic feat of cutesiness. But wait, there’s more. Still from Amazon:

And he is on an urgent, secret search through the five boroughs of New York to find the lock that fits a mysterious key belonging to his father, who died in the attacks on the World Trade Center.

Oh, snap. No he didn’t.

Oh, yes, he did. But it couldn’t get any bigger, could it? It could, and it does:

His search for the lock careens from Central Park to Coney Island to the Bronx and beyond. But it also travels into history, to Dresden and Hiroshima, where horrific bombings once shattered other lives. Along the way, Oskar encounters a motley assortment of humanity — a 103-year-old war reporter, a tour guide who never leaves the Empire State Building, lovers enraptured or scorned — all survivors in their own ways.
Now we’ve got firebombing, nuclear annihilation and the Cyclone thrown in the mix – you just know this shit’s gonna be deep. Oprah deep. Liev Schreiber deep.

If only Foer had a chance to add the tsunami – this thing could have been really hot.

I love you Low Culture!
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

I found a kindred "Everything is Illuminated"-hating spirit

Hannah at The Next Left has kindly allowed us to reprint her postings about JSF. Her first post dated 03.04.05:

EverythingIsIlluminated.jpg

I'm excited by this teaser, which implies that wunderkind novelist Jonathan Safran Foer might make the NY Press's "50 Most Loathsome New Yorkers" list this year. I thought I was the only person in the world who thought "Everything is Illuminated" was just another arrogant, self-absorbed Jewish male novel. I only made it through 100 pages, but I remember one female character, who was a sex object at age 10 and enjoyed getting beaten by her husband.

Maybe I just didn't get it. On the other hand, maybe I'm just annoyed that someone my age is already a famous writer.
Cheers, Hannah!
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

Foer Haters Unite

This is Hannah's second post about JSF:

Hand3.jpg

On one hand, it's sort of embarassing that the New York Press devoted its cover to a critique novelist Jonathan Safran Foer. I wonder if Foer stole the NYP editor's girlfriend or something. On the other hand, I'm grateful that someone besides me thinks Foer is a self-indulgent, pseudo-literary hack. I thought his first book, Everything is Illuminated, exhibited the sort of faux creativity one might expect from a high school creative writing contest. And Foer has this penchant for writing saintly characters that just happen to be reminiscent of himself (in Everything is Illuminated, the saintly character happened to be named Jonathan Safran Foer). This is in addition to the fact that essentially the only female character in Everything is Illuminated (or at least in the first 100 pages, which is all I read) was a ten year old sex object who enjoyed getting beaten by her husband. Hooray for Jonathan Safran Foer, the new literary voice of the Jews.

So I'm not planning to pick up his latest work, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, which is about a 9-year-old savant whose father died in 9/11. (His first novel was about the Holocaust. Is that heroic or what?) But I did enjoy reading Harry Siegel's review. He calls the book "a hall of mirrors reflecting nothing but Foers and stock characters who reflect back the wonderful-ness of the author." The biggest life lesson the book imparts, Siegel writes, is that "the search, not the treasure, is the thing, which readers may recognize from the pages of Robert Fulghum's classic of inspirational mush All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten."

But, don't listen to me. If you want a different point of view, you can read the NYT review, which is almost as cloying as the author himself.

UPDATE: Thanks to Matt for linking to this great Foer parody from the New York Observer. It's from Tom Scocca's Off The Record column in the NYO. He pretends to have discovered missing emails between Jonathan Safran Foer and a worshipful Deborah Solomon, who wrote about him for the NYT magazine. Full text after the jump, but here's a taste:

Sometimes I weep at the end of the day. And I wonder: Is the sun truly going away from us, or are we the ones who are going away from it?

This is from Tom Scocca's Off The Record column in the NYO. He pretends to have discovered missing emails between Jonathan Safran Foer and a worshipful Deborah Solomon, who wrote about him for the NYT magazine:

Incredibly, Incredibly Close: Deborah Solomon on novelist Jonathan Safran Foer, New York Times Magazine, Feb. 27:

[Our correspondence] came to include, in scarcely more than a month, some 150 e-mail messages from Foer, many of them wickedly hilarious, others gravely literary, and running to thousands of words.

"That's a lot to think about," Foer wrote with his usual intensity. "It would take 1,000 letters just to scratch the surface, and I doubt the scratch would be too deep. I'll give it a shot. When I come back I'll get started with letter #1."

No. 1: I'm back now from walking the dog. You had asked me what I meant by giving you a piece of blank paper from the desk of Isaac Bashevis Singer: Was it "a comment on the futility of texts," or "an evocation of all the beautiful ideas and feelings that remain to be inscribed on that great blank page known as the future"? I'm starting to think that perhaps it was both. Or neither. Or some combination of the two.

No. 3: I must again stress, despite the source of that blank paper, and despite the portrait of Singer on my wall, and despite the fact that I, too, use three names, that it would be inaccurate to compare or equate myself to Singer in any way.

No. 15: That was a beautiful passage you wrote, about how when we said goodbye at 4 p.m., "the fading daylight lent the moment a veiled, elegiac feeling, an unsettling suggestion of oblivion." Sometimes I weep at the end of the day. And I wonder: Is the sun truly going away from us, or are we the ones who are going away from it?

No. 23: It was kind or perceptive of you to say that I "might be called a European novelist who happens to be writing in America." In the end, I think we are all sometimes prisoners of plate tectonics.

No. 120: I was walking George in the park again earlier this hour when she suddenly lunged and gobbled up half the remains of a dead squirrel. Five minutes later, she vomited it all over the grass. She vomited it up so easily and nonchalantly, it gave me a pang. Dogs have such pure, honest reactions to things—both coming and going.

No. 152: You don't think it seems too aggressively butch for me to call my female dog "George," do you? For what it's worth, I adopted a tomcat this past weekend. I have named him Princess Jasmine Fluffytoes.

No. 274 or 275 (depending): Remember how I sent you that e-mail while I was waiting to meet up with you, so you'd get it when you got back from the interview? I am sending you this e-mail in the middle of writing another e-mail, so it gets there sooner. Wait till you see what I've already told you!

No. 338: Wrting this on my new BlackBerry frmo the bathroom. I'm hvaing a little troouble getting used to thesse tiny keys. But it occurred to me that every trip to the bathroom is a little act of letting go. I needed to tell you that.

No. 339: Well, not every act. If you're just brushing your teeth, for instance. But even that, really. Suppose you brushed your teeth and you spat out a little strand of meat that had been stuck there and then you got hit by a truck? That would have been your last meal, and you would have missed the very last part of it.

No. 443: Paper towels, dish soap (unscented), mushrooms, milk (2 percent, skim). Am I forgetting anything? Oh, onions.

No. 516: The pineapple has such a tough, leathery skin. It's almost an imposture to drink pineapple juice; it's hardly a true experience of the pineapple. Drinking pineapple juice is life made easy. It's fraudulence. I adore my pineapple juice, though.

No. 590: if the world were already silent, what would stillness sound like? then i think it would sound like the soft rustle of the newest leaves in a spring breeze. everyone would feel awkward.

No. 627: I told you that I wished I could talk like a black person. It's more than that, really: I wish, in the give and take between us, that I could give myself to you as a strong black man. You could receive my thoughts as if I were making strong love to you on satin sheets with the music of Barry White or Marvin Gaye playing—making love to you with my large penis, which would not be an offensive racial stereotype yet would be a penis of unmistakable substance. Instead I feel as if I'm humping away in a rabbity fashion on a futon, after a dinner of takeout Italian, with Dido on the stereo, and I'm hoping to make up for my shortcomings with earnest cunnilingus in a little while. This is all just a figure of speech!

No. 820: Princess Jasmine Fluffytoes is asleep in my lap right this second.

No. 875: Writing is above all, I think, an act of faith. You put the words out there and hope. For instance, I can write "pat your head," but I have no way of knowing whether you would actually pat your head in response. Or "stand up." Now sit down. Stand up again. Blink three times. See? Pure faith.

No. 999: I feel as if I made a hopelessly inadequate profile subject. You are too kind to have paid so much attention to me. I really would be glad if I could give you the chance to do another profile. Maybe this one could be good enough to be on the cover. I know a literary novelist is less important than movie stars, especially Oscar week, but maybe there won't be movie stars. I will try to give you everything you need. I am putty in your hands.

No. 1,000: It wouldn't have to be the cover!

TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

All Right Jonathan Safran Foer: It's go-time

A reprint of Dadahead's original post of 05.12.05 at his blog about JSF:
Despite the fact that my last attempt to goad a semi-public figure into a fight was an abject failure, due to said semi-public figure being a total pussy, I am going to make another attempt to mete out a brutal, well-deserved ass-whoopin' on yet another pseudo-prodigious jackanapes.

That's right: I'm talking to you, Jonathan Safran Foer. It's go-time, bitch.

Now, you might be asking: Who the fuck is Jonathan Safran Foer? Why do you want to kick his ass? And why does he need three names?

Well, if you're not familiar with this particular snot-nosed little punk, he's a 'writer' with two novels to his name at the ripe-old-age of 26. He is also a pretentious little cunt, and I'm not the only one who thinks so. Matt at Code Three is also an enthusiastic Foer-hater (in fact, his recent post on the matter was the inspiration for this present effort to kick the shit out of Foer), and Hannah at The Next Left (whom I found via Matt) calls for "Foer Haters [to] Unite". A recent New York Press review called Foer a "fraud and a hack."

The reason for all this animosity should be clear immediately upon reading a description of Foer's work. From Amazon's summary of his first novel, Everything Is Illuminated:

A young Jewish American--who just happens to be called Jonathan Safran Foer--travels to the Ukraine in the hope of finding the woman who saved his grandfather from the Nazis. He is aided in his search by Alex Perchov, a naïve Ukrainian translator, Alex's grandfather (also called Alex), and a flatulent mongrel dog named Sammy Davis Jr. Jr. On their journey through Eastern Europe's obliterated landscape they unearth facts about the Nazi atrocities and the extent of Ukrainian complicity that have implications for Perchov as well as Safran Foer.
Cute, huh?--the main character's name is Jonathan Safran Foer, just like the author! Hey JACKASS--Paul Auster already pulled this trick almost twenty years ago, and you're not 1/1000th the writer he is.

Having already tackled the Holocaust, Foer moves on to the attack on the World Trade Center for the background of his newest book, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close:
Oskar Schell, hero of this brilliant follow-up to Foer's bestselling Everything Is Illuminated, is a nine-year-old amateur inventor, jewelry designer, astrophysicist, tambourine player and pacifist. Like the second-language narrator of Illuminated, Oskar turns his naïvely precocious vocabulary to the understanding of historical tragedy, as he searches New York for the lock that matches a mysterious key left by his father when he was killed in the September 11 attacks, a quest that intertwines with the story of his grandparents, whose lives were blighted by the firebombing of Dresden. Foer embellishes the narrative with evocative graphics, including photographs, colored highlights and passages of illegibly overwritten text, and takes his unique flair for the poetry of miscommunication to occasionally gimmicky lengths, like a two-page soliloquy written entirely in numerical code.
Also, at the end of the novel, there is a flip book of a cartoon character falling off of the top of the WTC. I'm not kidding.

Harry Siegel, who wrote the New York Press article, tears Foer a new one:

It's bad form to call a living writer corrupt and debased, which is why I begged out of a review I'd been assigned of Jonathan Safran Foer's highly touted debut novel, Everything Is Illuminated ... I understand how a young man could write such a book, but not why he would have it published, and certainly not how it could be acclaimed as marking the arrival of a major new talent. (The $500,000 advance, and later nearly $1 million for the movie rights, and another $1 million for the follow-up, may have helped.)

...

Having "read" Foer's latest—if that's what one does to this cut-and-paste assemblage of words, pictures, blank pages and pages where the text runs together and becomes illegible—it's time for bad form.

Foer isn't just a bad author, he's a vile one.

... the book is an Oprah-etic paean to innocence and verbosity as embodied by Foer's latest saintly stand-in (there was a character named Jonathan Safran Foer in Everything Is Illuminated), nine-year-old Oskar Schell, who has a business card, speaks French, walks the city at odd hours by himself, writes letters to Stephen Hawking and other luminaries, knows more facts than any of the adults he speaks with, flirts with women, is a vegan, an atheist and otherwise equal parts unbelievable and unbearable. Foer, I should note, is a Jewish atheist, wrote letters to Susan Sontag when he was nine, and otherwise sounds like he'd make unbearable company, though perhaps not as much as the obnoxiously precocious, overeducated brat Schell. If Foer is beginning to sound like a minor Saul Bellow character (think the masturbating uncle in Mr. Sammler's Planet), he has only himself to blame.

By the way, is little 9-year-old Oskar beginning to remind you of anybody? Just wondering.

The plot is a series of contrivances that free the nine-year-old Schell to walk the city by himself in a shaggy-dog quest for the meaning of a key his father, who died in the towers, left behind. This is mixed in with an epistolary saga involving Oskar's grandparents, a woman who serves as still another Foer stand-in and a man who can't write, but only speak, leaving the reader in a hall of mirrors reflecting nothing but Foers and stock characters who reflect back the wonderful-ness of the author.

Eventually, the Schnells' stories converge into one absurdly convenient superstory, saturated with meaning, from which we learn such lessons as, "You cannot protect yourself from sadness without also protecting yourself from happiness," "'I do not want to hurt you, he said'… 'It hurts me when you do not want to hurt me,' I told him," and "I spent my life learning to feel less."

And those quotes are all from one, not unrepresentative page.

Most of all, we learn the search, not the treasure, is the thing, which readers may recognize from the pages of Robert Fulghum's classic of inspirational mush All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.

...

And with the same easy spirit in which he pillages other authors' techniques, stripping them of their context and using them merely for show, he snatches 9/11 to invest his conceit with gravitas, thus crossing the line that separates the risible from the villainous. The book's themes—the sense of connection we all feel when the coffee or acid hits and everything is illuminated, the brain-gurble and twitch and self-pity we all know better than to write about—have nothing to do with the attack on the towers, or with Dresden or Hiroshima, which Foer tosses in just to make sure we understand what a big and important book we're dealing with.

Foer, you represent everything that is wrong with contemporary art and literature. You are the George W. Bush of fiction: if you've earned nothing, you have no discernible ability, and you make a mockery of everything you touch. I guarantee you that your books will be lucky to fetch $0.25 at a fucking garage sale ten years from now.

I am giving you an ultimatum: stop publishing books. Now. You are never to publish another book. If you feel compelled to write this vomit-inducing garbage, do so in the privacy of your own home, though I doubt you would write a single sentence if you didn't think it was going to get your ugly face in the New Yorker. I'm serious: you publish another novel, another short story, an essay, anything, and I will kill you.

You've been warned. If I ever see you, I'm kicking your ass; it's too late for you to avoid that. But if you ever, ever, publish another word, you will not live to see your next glowing review from your fellow pretentious loser frauds at the Village Voice.

You pompous little scrotum-sucker.
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

Oh, snap. Yes, he did.

A reprint of my original post on 2.27.05 at Code Three about JSF:
For all the necessary information about Jonathan Safran Foer please check out Low Culture. Don't worry, I'll wait. Okay, so that pretty much sums it up. The guy sucks. The guy is everything a writer shouldn't be. Of course, this means that he gets a huge NYT Magazine article profiling what a great writer is he. An excerpt to further prove why J.S. Foer sucks.
He was all of 25 when he emerged out of nowhere, in 2002, with his widely acclaimed first novel, ''Everything Is Illuminated.'' Begun while he was still an undergraduate at Princeton, it tells the story of a young, self-deprecating writer named Jonathan Safran Foer who travels to a vanished shtetl in Ukraine, searching for a woman he believed saved his grandfather from the Nazis. The book has sold more than 100,000 copies in hardcover and another 150,000 in paperback, making it that rare event in the publishing industry, a literary best seller, and proving that a difficult, cerebral novel is not doomed to sell 23 copies, all of them to the author's mother. A film version of the novel, directed by Liev Schreiber, is scheduled to be released in August. Foer's second novel, ''Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close,'' will be published in about a month. It shifts his landscape from the wounded earth of Eastern Europe to a fresher site of devastation. The book's main narrator is Oskar Schell, a 9-year-old schoolboy whose father was killed in the attack on the World Trade Center. An aspiring inventor, Oskar consoles himself by thinking up far-fetched creations that could protect people from all sorts of injury. In the process, he becomes a kind of artist, someone whose dreams are so romantic that they are destined to failure. Oskar's creativity is echoed in the design of the novel, a highly experimental affair that draws upon photographs and typographical play in an attempt to blur the old boundaries between image and text.
Jesus. If you're still not convinced, here's a photo.



See how fucking sensitive he is. He sucks. QED. While I'm at it, Majikthise alerts us to the awesome idiocy of the "Liberal" NY Times. I understand that the NY Times is a Centerist newspaper of the business class, but as we all should have learned from Clinton, the problem with Centerism is that wherever the center goes the Centerist must follow. The Centerist can never lead the center anywhere. He or she is doomed to forever be its slave. Now that the country is rapidly drifting well past the right, the Centerist and their newspapers must follow. Remember, Kerry's domestic social policies were well to the right of Nixon's.
He has only become more powerful in the months since then. He must be shamed out of existence.
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

Why?

With all the problems in the world, why bother with little Jonathan Safran Foer? There is no really good response to this question. I should be learning to garden, hunt, living simply, concentrating on getting into medical school, and being with my friends and girlfriend. That's absolutely what I should be doing. Sometimes, though, you just can't resist. It's just so much fun! JSF represents everything that is wrong with the majority of American authors and "intellectuals". He's smug, self-satisfied, lazy, and utterly narcissistic. Not that there is anything wrong with any of these traits in moderation. I embody them all, myself. The problem is that this asshole takes it to the most logical and horrible extreme. If you have anything to say or an article you would like to bring to our attention, please contribute! We're always looking for new members at Foer Haters United!
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++

5.13.2005

Haters of the World Unite

You've searched long and hard and now you've arrived. Welcome.
TECHNORATI TAGS: ++